In defense of the em dash
Thereās much agita online about the impact of artificial intelligence on creative works. Now, Iām an engineer, and Iām not totally qualified to speak on philosophical topics such as this. However, thereās one hot-button issue thatās irritating me: the downfall of the em-dash.
In a few short years, this simple piece of punctuation has fallen from an indispensable signifier of well-separated sentences, to an irritating suggestion that a given work was created by a āclankerā. Iām not going to lie ā I understand where this is coming from. Certain LLMs, especially ChatGPT, tend to overuse em dashes. This is because em dashes are quite common in the datasets used for early training: much of the text came from high-quality, literary sources where plenty of em dashes were used.
I tend to have a very non-linear thought process ā branching out for a āsidebarā and then returning to the main topic. Iām a huge fan of footnotes, margin notes, parentheses, brackets, parenthetical commas, and ā yes ā the em dash. On MacOS, which is my daily driver, the keyboard shortcut is Option Shift -, and this has been indelibly burned into my fingersā āmuscle memoryā. To me, it feels ironic that the em dash is considered a highfalutinā mark of punctuation, because the way I use it is just the opposite ā itās an admission that I got distracted, I want to interrupt myself; a confession that my train of thought has left the station but will be back momentarily. Iāve always felt weirdly fond of the em dash, and I plan to continue using it.
As a millennial, Iāve seen many memes come and go over the years, but I canāt remember a meme quite like this, creating rules about how we as humans are allowed to express ourselves. I suppose I wrote this article to express my intention to break this rule āĀ a proclamation that I donāt like it, and I will not comply. And isnāt that just about the most human thing there is? š¤